Cyber Resilience

NIST 800-53 r5 · Controls catalogue · Family PE

PE-23Facility Location

Plan the location or site of the facility where the system resides considering physical and environmental hazards; and For existing facilities, consider the physical and environmental hazards in the organizational risk management strategy.

Last updated: 04 July 2026 00:28 UTC

Cumulative inbound coverage

How completely the frameworks we cross-walk collectively cover this — the verdict is the strongest single mapping (overlapping partials are not summed); breadth shows the corroboration behind it.

Collective: mostly · 1 mapping(s) from 1 framework(s): CSF 2.0 1 (mostly)

See the full cumulative-coverage rollup →

Implementations targeting this control (0)

ATT&CK techniques this control mitigates (0)

Weaknesses this control addresses (4)AI

CWEs ranked by how often they appear in real CVEs. The rationale describes how this control reduces exploitability of each weakness class.

CWE Name CVEs Why this control addresses it
CWE-284Improper Access Control5,367Facility siting decisions that account for physical hazards strengthen overall access control by limiting unauthorized physical entry vectors.
CWE-668Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere797Planning facility placement prevents exposure of critical resources to environmental or physical threat spheres.
CWE-653Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization66Locating systems away from hazards improves isolation and compartmentalization from external physical or environmental threats.
CWE-1263Improper Physical Access Control13Selecting facility sites to avoid physical and environmental hazards directly reduces the exploitability of improper physical access controls.

Top CVEs where this control is the strongest mitigation

CVE Risk CVSS EPSS Match
No CVEs annotated to this control yet — the per-CVE backfill is in progress.

Other controls in family PE

PE-1 PE-10 PE-11 PE-12 PE-13 PE-14 PE-15 PE-16 PE-17 PE-18 PE-19 PE-2 PE-20 PE-21 PE-22 PE-3 PE-4 PE-5 PE-6 PE-7 PE-8 PE-9