CVE-2023-1419
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2023-1419 is a medium-severity Improper Handling of Parameters (CWE-233) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 5.9 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data Obfuscation (T1001); ranked at the 31th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-3265
Vulnerability Data
A script injection vulnerability was found in the Debezium database connector, where it does not properly sanitize some parameters. This flaw allows an attacker to send a malicious request to inject a parameter that may allow the viewing of unauthorized…
more
data.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
SI-10 requires validity checks on information inputs, directly stopping missing or undefined parameters from being accepted.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and correct parameter handling to avoid this weakness.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices (secure requirements, checkpoints, secure coding guidelines, testing, developer training) that reach improper parameter handling in the design/coding/testing phases, but leaves a bounded remainder (e.g. incomplete enforcement of guidelines, outsourced development without full assurance, or post-release parameter logic errors).
Application security requirements explicitly call for validation of inputs and parameters, mitigating missing or undefined arguments.
Secure coding standards directly address proper handling of function parameters and input validation.
Security testing can detect missing-parameter issues but does not prevent them at design time.