Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-2013

Gitlab 1.2.0 – 15.10.8

Published
07 June 2023
Modified
07 January 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 2.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0069 50th percentile
Risk Priority 26 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-2013 is a low-severity Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames (CWE-1021) vulnerability in Gitlab Gitlab. Its CVSS base score is 2.6 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Drive-by Compromise (T1189); ranked at the 50th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 1.2 before 15.10.8, all versions starting from 15.11 before 15.11.7, all versions starting from 16.0 before 16.0.2. An issue was found that allows someone to abuse a…

more

discrepancy between the Web application display and the git command line interface to social engineer victims into cloning non-trusted code.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
T1056 Input Capture Collection
Adversaries may use methods of capturing user input to obtain credentials or collect information.
T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-10733Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-0362Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2024-7404Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2024-2177Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-3254Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-3102Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-9958Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-1401Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-3399Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-3413Same product: Gitlab Gitlab

Affected Assets

gitlab
gitlab
1.2.0 — 15.10.8 · 1.2.0 — 15.10.8 · 15.11.0 — 15.11.7

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require implementing frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options controls that prevent this weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing frame protections, but does not itself implement the control.

degrades

Web filtering can block or sandbox untrusted frames, but does not enforce application-level frame-busting or CSP.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options, directly addressing UI redressing risks.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include isolation of UI layers and proper use of browser security controls.

prevents

Secure coding practices directly require implementation of frame-busting headers or CSP frame-ancestors directives.

References