Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-23443

Memory Safety in Hihonor Magic Os ≤ 7.0.0.156

Published
29 December 2023
Modified
17 April 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0016 6th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-23443 is a medium-severity Type Confusion (CWE-843) vulnerability in Hihonor Magic Os. Its CVSS base score is 4.6 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 6th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Some Honor products are affected by type confusion vulnerability, successful exploitation could cause information leak.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-51427Same product: Hihonor Magic Os
CVE-2023-51428Same product: Hihonor Magic Os
CVE-2023-51426Same product: Hihonor Magic Os
CVE-2023-51429Same product: Hihonor Magic Os
CVE-2023-6939Same vendor: Hihonor
CVE-2023-51434Same vendor: Hihonor
CVE-2023-51430Same vendor: Hihonor
CVE-2023-23430Same vendor: Hihonor
CVE-2023-51435Same vendor: Hihonor
CVE-2023-23426Same vendor: Hihonor

Affected Assets

hihonor
magic os
≤ 7.0.0.156

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.5.2
  • V3.2.3
  • V15.3.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent type-confusion flaws via safe typing, static analysis, and code review while the control itself addresses many additional weaknesses.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development can detect type-confusion vulnerabilities through fuzzing and static analysis.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates type-safe design and review that can catch type-confusion flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify strong typing and interface contracts that reduce type confusion.

prevents

Secure architecture principles promote type-safe languages and memory-safety mechanisms that mitigate type confusion.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly forbid unsafe type casts and require static-analysis checks for type confusion.

References