Security Resilience

CVE-2023-27279

Ibm Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 – 5.0.7

Published
19 April 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0071 52th percentile
Risk Priority 51 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-27279 is a medium-severity Improper Control of Interaction Frequency (CWE-799) vulnerability in Ibm Aspera Faspex. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked in the top 48% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-10 (Concurrent Session Control) and AC-7 (Unsuccessful Logon Attempts) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.7 could allow a user to cause a denial of service due to missing API rate limiting. IBM X-Force ID: 248533.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-36230Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2023-35907Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2023-37398Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2023-37411Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2024-45098Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2023-37412Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2024-45096Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2023-22869Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2025-36229Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex
CVE-2023-37400Same product: Ibm Aspera Faspex

Affected Assets

ibm
aspera faspex
5.0.0 — 5.0.7

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

ac-10 enforces a hard limit on concurrent sessions per user, directly stopping uncontrolled interaction frequency at the session level.

ac-7 directly enforces a limit on the frequency of invalid authentication attempts, structurally preventing the weakness for that interaction class.

sc-5 reduces the impact of excessive request volume (DoS) but does not itself impose the frequency controls whose absence defines the weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly include controls on interaction frequency and throttling.

blocks

Secure architecture principles recommend rate-limiting and resource-management mechanisms.

prevents

Secure coding practices can embed input-frequency and throttling checks in code.

degrades

Capacity management directly limits request rates and resource exhaustion that CWE-799 describes.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-799, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-307.

References