Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-32257 is a high-severity Race Condition (CWE-362) vulnerability in Linux Linux Kernel. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked in the top 18% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A flaw exists in the Linux kernel's ksmbd component, the in-kernel SMB server. The vulnerability occurs during handling of SMB2_SESSION_SETUP and SMB2_LOGOFF commands and stems from missing synchronization primitives when operating on shared objects, producing a race condition (CWE-362, CWE-667). Successful exploitation grants an attacker the ability to run arbitrary code inside the kernel. The issue carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1 with network attack vector and no required credentials or user interaction.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger the race by sending a crafted sequence of session-setup and logoff requests. Because the flaw resides in kernel memory management, compromise yields full control over the target system, including the ability to read, modify, or destroy arbitrary data and to install persistent root-level malware.
Public advisories from Red Hat, NetApp, and the Zero Day Initiative reference upstream kernel patches that add the missing locking around the affected session objects; administrators are advised to apply the relevant updates or to disable ksmbd if it is not required.
EPSS for the CVE rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.0975 on 2025-01-22 before receding, indicating a clear post-disclosure increase in observed exploitation interest that warrants renewed monitoring.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-36514
Vulnerability Data
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's ksmbd, a high-performance in-kernel SMB server. The specific flaw exists within the processing of SMB2_SESSION_SETUP and SMB2_LOGOFF commands. The issue results from the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an…
more
object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the kernel.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V10.4.2V10.4.5V15.1.3V15.4.1
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Accurate timestamps from internal clocks enable detection of race conditions by providing reliable event ordering in audit logs.
Coordination of concurrent security activities reduces the probability that shared resources will be accessed simultaneously without proper synchronization.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require proper synchronization primitives and concurrency testing that prevent race conditions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect race conditions, but does not prevent them at design or coding time.
Secure SDLC mandates concurrency controls and synchronization primitives that directly prevent race conditions.
Application security requirements can specify thread-safety and locking rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture principles require proper synchronization and resource isolation, addressing the root cause of CWE-362.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe concurrent access patterns and mandate atomic operations or locks.
Change management may catch locking issues introduced by modifications but does not prevent the weakness itself.