Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-32642

Intel Killer ≤ 3.1423.712

Published
14 February 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0037 30th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-32642 is a medium-severity Insufficient Adherence to Expected Conventions (CWE-1076) vulnerability in Intel Killer. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Insufficient adherence to expected conventions for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless and Intel(R) Killer(TM) Wi-Fi software before version 22.240 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-34983Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-32644Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-28720Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-33875Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2024-28049Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2024-23198Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2024-25563Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-26586Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-32651Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-28374Same product: Intel Killer

Affected Assets

intel
killer
≤ 3.1423.712
intel
proset\/wireless
≤ 22.240

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices explicitly include enforcing coding, design, and documentation conventions and monitoring adherence.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Directly requires compliance with rules and standards, which include coding and documentation conventions.

prevents

Architecture principles may include conventions but are not the primary enforcement mechanism.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address adherence to coding conventions.

prevents

Policies can mandate adherence to conventions but do not guarantee technical enforcement.

degrades

Defined roles can assign responsibility for convention compliance but do not ensure it occurs.

prevents

Documented procedures can specify conventions but do not guarantee they are followed.

References