Security Resilience

CVE-2023-32642

Intel Killer ≤ 3.1423.712

Published
14 February 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0037 30th percentile
Risk Priority 37 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-32642 is a medium-severity Insufficient Adherence to Expected Conventions (CWE-1076) vulnerability in Intel Killer. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) and SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Insufficient adherence to expected conventions for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless and Intel(R) Killer(TM) Wi-Fi software before version 22.240 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-28720Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-34983Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-33875Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-32644Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2024-25563Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2024-28049Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2024-23198Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-25951Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-32651Same product: Intel Killer
CVE-2023-26586Same product: Intel Killer

Affected Assets

intel
killer
≤ 3.1423.712
intel
proset\/wireless
≤ 22.240

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Requires the developer to follow documented development processes, standards, and tools, directly enforcing adherence to conventions in code, design, and artifacts.

Requires developer testing and evaluation that can identify deviations from required coding, design, or documentation conventions.

Mandates use of an SDLC that incorporates security and privacy conventions into system acquisition, development, and management.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.5.1 only requires the existence of an overarching policy and topic-specific policies (including one on secure development); it does not itself enforce conventions in architecture, code, design or artifacts, so the weakness can still arise and be exploited.

degrades

Defined roles can assign responsibility for convention compliance but do not ensure it occurs.

finds

Directly requires compliance with rules and standards, which include coding and documentation conventions.

blocks

Documented procedures can specify conventions but do not guarantee they are followed.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing and developer training that reach a minority slice of convention-adherence failures (those caught by design reviews, code scans or secure-coding rules), but most convention violations arise from inconsistent application, undocumented expectations or non-security conventions outside its scope.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates establishing and applying security engineering principles (security by design, least privilege, default deny, fail securely, distrust external input, hardening, design review against attack patterns) that directly address and stop insufficient adherence to conventions from producing exploitable defects; the bounded remainder is non-technical conventions (e.g. purely stylistic documentation or naming) outside the clause's security-engineering focus.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-1076, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References