Security Resilience

CVE-2023-3266

Cyberpower Powerpanel Server ≤ 2.6.9

Published
14 August 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0088 58th percentile
Risk Priority 73 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-3266 is a critical-severity Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard (CWE-358) vulnerability in Cyberpower Powerpanel Server. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Steganography (T1001.002); ranked in the top 42% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A non-feature complete authentication mechanism exists in the production application allowing an attacker to bypass all authentication checks if LDAP authentication is selected.An unauthenticated attacker can leverage this vulnerability to log in to the CypberPower PowerPanel Enterprise as an administrator…

more

by selecting LDAP authentication from a hidden HTML combo box. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability also requires the attacker to know at least one username on the device, but any password will authenticate successfully.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001.002 Steganography Command And Control
Adversaries may use steganographic techniques to hide command and control traffic to make detection efforts more difficult.
T1003.003 NTDS Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access or create a copy of the Active Directory domain database in order to steal credential information, as well as obtain other information about domain members such as devices, users, and access rights.
T1003.007 Proc Filesystem Credential Access
Adversaries may gather credentials from the proc filesystem or `/proc`.
T1011 Exfiltration Over Other Network Medium Exfiltration
Adversaries may attempt to exfiltrate data over a different network medium than the command and control channel.
T1012 Query Registry Discovery
Adversaries may interact with the Windows Registry to gather information about the system, configuration, and installed software.
T1016 System Network Configuration Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may look for details about the network configuration and settings, such as IP and/or MAC addresses, of systems they access or through information discovery of remote systems.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-3267Same product: Cyberpower Powerpanel Server
CVE-2023-3265Same product: Cyberpower Powerpanel Server
CVE-2025-59147Shared CWE-358
CVE-2024-36511Shared CWE-358
CVE-2024-5500Shared CWE-358
CVE-2026-70174Shared CWE-358
CVE-2023-40445Shared CWE-358
CVE-2025-21267Shared CWE-358
CVE-2025-66607Shared CWE-358
CVE-2025-31969Shared CWE-358

Affected Assets

cyberpower
powerpanel server
≤ 2.6.9

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V17.2.8

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-358

Assessments identify and document improperly implemented security checks, allowing fixes that reduce exploitation of flawed checks.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices directly require correct implementation of standardized security checks and algorithms.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Use of cryptography control depends on correct implementation of standardized cryptographic checks.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates security requirements, checkpoints, secure coding, testing (incl. code scans/pen tests) and developer capability in the SDLC, which reaches a minority slice of CWE-358 (incorrect implementation of a standardized security check) but leaves most instances (e.g. flawed protocol logic, spec misinterpretation, or non-coded design errors) unaddressed.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for correct implementation of standardized security mechanisms.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates applying security-by-design principles (defense-in-depth, least privilege, fail securely, distrust external input, security-oriented design reviews) that reach some but not most instances of CWE-358, which is a narrow implementation error against a standardized check (e.g. protocol-level auth bypass, cert validation flaw) that can still arise in code even when the principles are followed.

References