CVE-2023-3436
Xpdfreader Xpdf 4.04
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:LSummary
CVE-2023-3436 is a low-severity Deadlock (CWE-833) vulnerability in Xpdfreader Xpdf. Its CVSS base score is 3.3 (Low).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 7th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-44100
Vulnerability Data
Xpdf 4.04 will deadlock on a PDF object stream whose "Length" field is itself in another object stream.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V15.4.3
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Advance scheduling and deconfliction of security tasks lowers the chance that overlapping operations will produce deadlock conditions on shared resources.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly include code reviews, static analysis, and concurrency standards that prevent improper locking.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect deadlock conditions through stress and concurrency testing.
Secure development lifecycle requires deadlock analysis and avoidance techniques during design and coding.
Application security requirements can mandate proper lock acquisition/release patterns.
Secure system architecture principles include concurrency controls and resource-locking discipline that prevent deadlock.
Secure coding standards mandate safe lock ordering, timeouts, and deadlock detection patterns.
Change management may catch locking issues introduced by modifications but does not prevent the weakness itself.