Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-34992

RCE in Fortinet Fortisiem 6.6.0 – 6.6.3

Published
10 October 2023
Modified
14 January 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 10.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.80 99.6th percentile
Risk Priority 100 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-34992 is a critical-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Fortinet Fortisiem. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 0.4% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2023-34992 is an OS command injection vulnerability, tracked under CWE-78, that affects Fortinet products. The flaw stems from improper neutralization of special elements in OS commands and can be triggered through crafted API requests, enabling execution of unauthorized code or commands. It carries a maximum CVSS 3.1 score of 10.0 with a network attack vector, no required authentication or user interaction, and changed scope that yields full impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

An unauthenticated attacker with network access can send malicious API requests to exploit the injection and run arbitrary commands on the affected system, resulting in complete compromise of the target.

The referenced Fortinet advisory FG-IR-23-130 provides official guidance on the issue and associated remediation steps.

The EPSS score has reached a peak of 0.8189 with a current value of 0.7716, indicating substantial exploitation interest following disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted API requests.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-23108Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2025-25256Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2023-36553Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2025-64155Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2024-23109Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2024-52969Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2023-40714Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2025-58324Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2026-25972Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2024-27780Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem

Affected Assets

fortinet
fortisiem
6.4.0, 6.4.1, 6.4.2, 6.5.0, 6.5.1 · 6.6.0 — 6.6.3 · 6.7.0 — 6.7.5

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-78

Platform-independent apps typically execute inside a managed runtime or sandbox that restricts direct OS command execution, reducing the ability to exploit OS command injection.

addresses: CWE-78

Validates inputs to block special elements that would alter OS command execution.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References