Security Resilience

CVE-2023-3517

Hitachi Pentaho Data Integration And Analytics 1.0 – 9.3.0.5

Published
12 December 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0064 50th percentile
Risk Priority 60 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-3517 is a high-severity Resource Injection (CWE-99) vulnerability in Hitachi Pentaho Data Integration And Analytics. Its CVSS base score is 8.5 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 50th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics versions before 9.5.0.1 and 9.3.0.5, including 8.3.x does not restrict JNDI identifiers during the creation of XActions, allowing control of system level data sources.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-1978Same vendor: Hitachi
CVE-2022-43939Same vendor: Hitachi
CVE-2023-39986Same vendor: Hitachi
CVE-2024-21840Same vendor: Hitachi
CVE-2026-2254Same vendor: Hitachi
CVE-2025-2514Same vendor: Hitachi
CVE-2024-28983Same vendor: Hitachi
CVE-2026-2072Same vendor: Hitachi
CVE-2023-1158Same vendor: Hitachi
CVE-2023-6538Same vendor: Hitachi

Affected Assets

hitachi
pentaho data integration and analytics
1.0 — 9.3.0.5 · 9.4.0.0 — 9.5.0.1

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reduce the chance of introducing resource injection flaws, but does not guarantee their absence at runtime and leaves a bounded remainder (e.g. incomplete enforcement of input restrictions or flaws in non-development phases).

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls on external identifiers used to access resources.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (e.g. distrust external input, least privilege, fail securely, data validation/sanitization) and design reviews that can stop resource injection from reaching production, but this is only a minority slice of CWE-99 because the control sets process expectations rather than mandating any specific runtime enforcement mechanism that would block exploitation of every possible identifier misuse.

prevents

Secure coding standards require strict validation and whitelisting of all resource identifiers before use.

finds

Security testing can detect resource-injection flaws but does not itself implement preventive controls.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-99, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References