Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-39204

Memory Safety in Zoom Meetings ≤ 5.15.10

Published
14 November 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.011 62th percentile
Risk Priority 39 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-39204 is a medium-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Zoom Meetings. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 38% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Buffer overflow in some Zoom clients may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct a denial of service via network access.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-39206Same product: Zoom Meetings
CVE-2025-46789Same product: Zoom Zoom
CVE-2025-49464Same product: Zoom Zoom
CVE-2025-49458Same product: Zoom Rooms
CVE-2025-46785Same product: Zoom Rooms
CVE-2023-34115Same vendor: Zoom
CVE-2023-36532Same product: Zoom Rooms
CVE-2024-24690Same product: Zoom Rooms
CVE-2023-43582Same product: Zoom Meetings
CVE-2023-39205Same product: Zoom Meetings

Affected Assets

zoom
meetings
≤ 5.15.10 · ≤ 5.15.10 · ≤ 5.15.10
zoom
rooms
≤ 5.15.10 · ≤ 5.15.10 · ≤ 5.15.10
zoom
video software development kit
≤ 5.15.10 · ≤ 5.15.10 · ≤ 5.15.10
zoom
virtual desktop infrastructure
≤ 5.14.13 · 5.15.0 — 5.15.11
zoom
zoom
≤ 5.15.10 · ≤ 5.15.10 · ≤ 5.15.10

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.1

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-120

Platform-independent managed code eliminates the need for unchecked native buffer copies that are the root cause of classic buffer overflows.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.

References