Security Resilience

CVE-2023-40723

Info Disclosure in Fortinet Fortisiem 5.1.0 – 6.4.2

Published
11 March 2025
Modified
22 July 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0036 28th percentile
Risk Priority 59 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-40723 is a high-severity Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor (CWE-200) vulnerability in Fortinet Fortisiem. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 28th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2023-40723 is an exposure of sensitive information vulnerability (CWE-200) affecting Fortinet FortiSIEM across multiple versions, including 6.7.0 through 6.7.4, 6.6.0 through 6.6.3, 6.5.0 through 6.5.1, 6.4.0 through 6.4.2, 6.3.0 through 6.3.3, 6.2.0 through 6.2.1, 6.1.0 through 6.1.2, 5.4.0, 5.3.0 through 5.3.3, 5.2.5 through 5.2.8, 5.2.1 through 5.2.2, and 5.1.0 through 5.1.3. The issue enables an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via an API request. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.1 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity due to its potential for significant impact despite elevated complexity.

A remote attacker with no privileges or user interaction required can exploit this vulnerability over the network, though it demands high attack complexity. Successful exploitation grants the attacker the ability to execute unauthorized code or commands, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability at a high level within the affected FortiSIEM instance.

The Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-23-117 at https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-23-117 provides further details on patches and mitigation strategies.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Fortinet FortiSIEM version 6.7.0 through 6.7.4 and 6.6.0 through 6.6.3 and 6.5.0 through 6.5.1 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.2 and 6.3.0 through 6.3.3 and 6.2.0 through 6.2.1 and 6.1.0 through 6.1.2…

more

and 5.4.0 and 5.3.0 through 5.3.3 and 5.2.5 through 5.2.8 and 5.2.1 through 5.2.2 and 5.1.0 through 5.1.3 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via api request.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-36551Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2023-41676Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2024-27780Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2026-59838Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2024-46667Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2023-40714Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2023-34992Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2025-25256Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2023-45585Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem
CVE-2024-55592Same product: Fortinet Fortisiem

Affected Assets

fortinet
fortisiem
5.1.0 — 6.4.2 · 6.5.0 — 6.5.2 · 6.6.0 — 6.6.4

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Access enforcement directly stops unauthorized actors from obtaining sensitive information.

Information flow enforcement structurally prevents sensitive data from reaching unauthorized recipients.

Protection of information at rest prevents unauthorized exposure of stored sensitive data.

Transmission confidentiality mechanisms stop exposure of sensitive data on the wire.

Least privilege reduces the set of actors who can reach sensitive information.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.5.10 only requires awareness, a topic-specific acceptable-use policy stating expected behaviours/monitoring, and procedures referencing classification and other controls; per the owner's explicit rule on labelling and similar dependency-style clauses, this does not itself prevent exposure (CWE-200) unless access/DLP/etc. act on it.

blocks

Requiring the return of all physical and electronic assets plus secure deletion of organizational data from personal devices reduces the chance that sensitive information remains accessible to departing personnel.

blocks

A.5.12 only defines and communicates a classification scheme so that protection needs can be understood; per the owner's explicit rule, labeling/classification does not itself prevent exposure and requires other controls (e.g. access enforcement) to act on it.

blocks

By requiring classification labels and metadata on all information assets, the control makes it harder for sensitive data to be inadvertently exposed because downstream systems and users can recognize and enforce handling rules based on those labels.

blocks

Requiring encryption, access controls, and recipient authentication for transfers directly reduces the chance that sensitive data reaches an unauthorized observer.

blocks

Secure delivery, protected storage, and confidentiality of allocation records limit exposure of authentication material to unauthorized observers.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

References