Security Resilience

CVE-2023-41935

Jenkins Azure Ad ≤ 348.vefd011eea_20b

Published
06 September 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0081 56th percentile
Risk Priority 59 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-41935 is a high-severity Incorrect Comparison (CWE-697) vulnerability in Jenkins Azure Ad. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 44% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Jenkins Azure AD Plugin 396.v86ce29279947 and earlier, except 378.380.v545b_1154b_3fb_, uses a non-constant time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected CSRF protection nonce are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid nonce.

CWE(s)
CWE-697

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-24426Same product: Jenkins Azure Ad
CVE-2026-42525Same product: Jenkins Azure Ad
CVE-2024-23903Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-46660Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-46658Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-41936Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-46656Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-46657Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2023-30530Same vendor: Jenkins
CVE-2025-67642Same vendor: Jenkins

Affected Assets

jenkins
azure ad
≤ 348.vefd011eea_20b · 378.vd6e2874a_69eb — 396.v86ce29279947

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.5.20 Addressing information security within supplier agreements partial match
removes
A.5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation partial match
removes
A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
blocks

Secure development lifecycle includes code review and testing that can catch incorrect comparison logic.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
blocks

Application security requirements can mandate correct comparison logic for security decisions.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
blocks

Secure architecture principles can require robust comparison mechanisms for access decisions.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards directly address avoiding incorrect comparison operators and logic.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-697, a pillar-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References