Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-49080

Info Disclosure in Jupyter Server ≤ 2.11.2

Published
04 December 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 3.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0084 55th percentile
Risk Priority 33 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-49080 is a low-severity Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information (CWE-209) vulnerability in Jupyter Jupyter Server. Its CVSS base score is 3.5 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Software (T1592.002); ranked in the top 45% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The Jupyter Server provides the backend (i.e. the core services, APIs, and REST endpoints) for Jupyter web applications like Jupyter notebook, JupyterLab, and Voila. Unhandled errors in API requests coming from an authenticated user include traceback information, which can include…

more

path information. There is no known mechanism by which to trigger these errors without authentication, so the paths revealed are not considered particularly sensitive, given that the requesting user has arbitrary execution permissions already in the same environment. A fix has been introduced in commit `0056c3aa52` which no longer includes traceback information in JSON error responses. For compatibility, the traceback field is present, but always empty. This commit has been included in version 2.11.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1592.002 Software Reconnaissance
Adversaries may gather information about the victim's host software that can be used during targeting.
T1082 System Information Discovery Discovery
An adversary may attempt to get detailed information about the operating system and hardware, including version, patches, hotfixes, service packs, and architecture.
T1592 Gather Victim Host Information Reconnaissance
Adversaries may gather information about the victim's hosts that can be used during targeting.
T1595 Active Scanning Reconnaissance
Adversaries may execute active reconnaissance scans to gather information that can be used during targeting.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-40934Same product: Jupyter Jupyter Server
CVE-2026-5422Same product: Jupyter Jupyter Server
CVE-2026-40110Same product: Jupyter Jupyter Server
CVE-2023-40170Same product: Jupyter Jupyter Server
CVE-2026-44727Same product: Jupyter Jupyter Server
CVE-2023-39968Same product: Jupyter Jupyter Server
CVE-2026-6657Same product: Jupyter Jupyter Server
CVE-2025-61669Same product: Jupyter Jupyter Server
CVE-2026-35397Same product: Jupyter Jupyter Server
CVE-2023-34339Shared CWE-209

Affected Assets

jupyter
jupyter server
≤ 2.11.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V16.5.1

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-209

Detects error messages that leak sensitive information as evidence of disclosure.

addresses: CWE-209

The control directly mitigates generation of error messages containing sensitive authentication details by requiring obscured feedback instead of verbose responses.

addresses: CWE-209

Misdirection allows generation of misleading error messages that withhold or falsify sensitive details.

addresses: CWE-209

Explicitly requires error messages to avoid including sensitive or exploitable details while still supporting corrective action.

addresses: CWE-209

Validation ensures error messages contain only expected, non-sensitive content and blocks leakage via verbose errors.

addresses: CWE-209

Fail-safe procedures can be defined to suppress or sanitize error output, reducing generation of messages that contain sensitive information.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require sanitized error handling to prevent sensitive data disclosure.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid exposing sensitive data in errors.

finds

Security testing can detect error messages that leak sensitive information.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
degrades

Logging policy can require suppression of sensitive data in error messages.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates error-handling rules that avoid leaking sensitive information.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify safe error messaging.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include proper exception handling.

References