CVE-2023-50469
Memory Safety in Szlbt Lbt-T300-T310 Firmware 2.2.2.6
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-50469 is a critical-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Szlbt Lbt-T300-T310 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 5% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T310 firmware version 2.2.2.6 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the handling of the ApCliEncrypType parameter passed to the /apply.cgi endpoint. The flaw is tracked as CWE-120 and received a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8, reflecting that it can be reached over the network without authentication or user interaction.
An unauthenticated attacker with network access can supply a maliciously crafted ApCliEncrypType value to trigger the overflow. Successful exploitation can result in arbitrary code execution, memory corruption, or a complete device compromise, consistent with the high impact metrics for confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Public references consist of a technical write-up and proof-of-concept hosted on GitHub; no vendor advisory, firmware update, or mitigation guidance is referenced in the available sources. The EPSS score has remained steady at 0.1011 since publication.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-55254
Vulnerability Data
Shenzhen Libituo Technology Co., Ltd LBT-T300-T310 v2.2.2.6 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the ApCliEncrypType parameter at /apply.cgi.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.1
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Platform-independent managed code eliminates the need for unchecked native buffer copies that are the root cause of classic buffer overflows.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.
Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.
Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.
Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.