Security Resilience

CVE-2023-5158

Linux Kernel ≤ 5.12.19

Published
25 September 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0021 11th percentile
Risk Priority 46 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-5158 is a medium-severity Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality (CWE-684) vulnerability in Linux Linux Kernel. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 11th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in vringh_kiov_advance in drivers/vhost/vringh.c in the host side of a virtio ring in the Linux Kernel. This issue may result in a denial of service from guest to host via zero length descriptor.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-41062Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-35907Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-56563Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-36033Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-36922Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-53106Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-49925Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-2235Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-44997Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-26971Same product: Linux Linux Kernel

Affected Assets

linux
linux kernel
≤ 5.12.19

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-684

Periodic checks confirm that specified security and privacy functions are actually provided and operating.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.25 requires that security be designed and implemented in the SDLC (including secure coding, requirements, testing and checkpoints), but does not itself stop incorrect functionality from being exploitable once the code is written and deployed; the weakness can still be present and reachable.

blocks

Explicit application security requirements and acceptance criteria help ensure the delivered software matches its intended specifications.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance validates that implemented functionality conforms to specifications before release.

blocks

Change management processes reduce the chance of unintended functional deviations during updates, though they do not directly address initial specification conformance.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-684, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References