Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-5215

Redhat Enterprise Linux 8.0 … 9.0

Public PoC
Published
28 September 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0075 51th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-5215 is a medium-severity Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type (CWE-241) vulnerability in Redhat Enterprise Linux. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked in the top 49% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in libnbd. A server can reply with a block size larger than 2^63 (the NBD spec states the size is a 64-bit unsigned value). This issue could lead to an application crash or other unintended behavior…

more

for NBD clients that doesn't treat the return value of the nbd_get_size() function correctly.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-5871Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-6121Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2026-11819Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2026-11820Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-3750Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-0119Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2025-7519Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-0923Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-40547Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux
CVE-2023-0813Same product: Redhat Enterprise Linux

Affected Assets

redhat
libnbd
≤ 1.18.0
redhat
enterprise linux
8.0, 9.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper input validation and type checking to prevent this weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can detect type-handling flaws but does not itself implement the preventive control.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes input validation and type checking that directly mitigates improper handling of unexpected data types.

prevents

Application security requirements typically mandate strong input validation and type enforcement to prevent malformed data processing.

prevents

Secure system architecture principles encourage robust input handling but do not specifically address data-type validation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly require type checking and input sanitization, directly addressing improper handling of unexpected data types.

References