Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-0183

XSS in Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal 1.0

Public PoCXSS
Published
01 January 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 2.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0055 43th percentile
Risk Priority 24 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-0183 is a low-severity Basic XSS (CWE-80) vulnerability in Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal. Its CVSS base score is 2.4 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was found in RRJ Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/students.php of the component NIA Office. The manipulation leads to basic cross site scripting.…

more

It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-249441 was assigned to this vulnerability.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1539 Steal Web Session Cookie Credential Access
An adversary may steal web application or service session cookies and use them to gain access to web applications or Internet services as an authenticated user without needing credentials.
T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-0181Same product: Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal
CVE-2024-0189Same product: Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal
CVE-2024-0190Same product: Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal
CVE-2024-0184Same product: Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal
CVE-2024-0192Same product: Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal
CVE-2024-0185Same product: Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal
CVE-2024-0191Same product: Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal
CVE-2024-0188Same product: Nia Rrj Nueva Ecija Engineer Online Portal
CVE-2025-58054Shared CWE-80
CVE-2025-12753Shared CWE-80

Affected Assets

nia
rrj nueva ecija engineer online portal
1.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.3.1
  • V1.3.3
  • V1.3.4

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect neutralization of script tags through targeted XSS test cases.

Input validation explicitly requires checking and neutralizing untrusted web inputs containing script-related characters before they reach a downstream renderer.

Secure engineering principles include mandatory output encoding and neutralization of HTML metacharacters to stop injection at the source.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require output encoding and input validation that prevent basic XSS.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches unneutralized script tags before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent basic XSS.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for neutralization of script-related HTML tags.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping of <, >, & to block XSS.

none

Web filtering can block some reflected XSS payloads at the network edge.

References