Security Resilience

CVE-2024-0208

Wireshark 3.6.0 – 3.6.19

Public PoC
Published
03 January 2024
Modified
03 November 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.018 79th percentile
Risk Priority 60 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-0208 is a high-severity Improper Handling of Missing Values (CWE-230) vulnerability in Wireshark Wireshark. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Junk Data (T1001.001); ranked in the top 21% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

GVCP dissector crash in Wireshark 4.2.0, 4.0.0 to 4.0.11, and 3.6.0 to 3.6.19 allows denial of service via packet injection or crafted capture file

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001.001 Junk Data Command And Control
Adversaries may add junk data to protocols used for command and control to make detection more difficult.
T1001.003 Protocol or Service Impersonation Command And Control
Adversaries may impersonate legitimate protocols or web service traffic to disguise command and control activity and thwart analysis efforts.
T1003.007 Proc Filesystem Credential Access
Adversaries may gather credentials from the proc filesystem or `/proc`.
T1006 Direct Volume Access Stealth
Adversaries may directly access a volume to bypass file access controls and file system monitoring.
T1007 System Service Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may try to gather information about registered local system services.
T1011 Exfiltration Over Other Network Medium Exfiltration
Adversaries may attempt to exfiltrate data over a different network medium than the command and control channel.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-9781Same product: Wireshark Wireshark
CVE-2023-5371Same product: Wireshark Wireshark
CVE-2026-5405Same product: Wireshark Wireshark
CVE-2023-0667Same product: Wireshark Wireshark
CVE-2026-5403Same product: Wireshark Wireshark
CVE-2026-3201Same product: Wireshark Wireshark
CVE-2024-8250Same product: Wireshark Wireshark
CVE-2026-7379Same product: Wireshark Wireshark
CVE-2023-4513Same product: Wireshark Wireshark
CVE-2026-5655Same product: Wireshark Wireshark

Affected Assets

wireshark
wireshark
4.2.0 · 3.6.0 — 3.6.19 · 4.0.0 — 4.0.11

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 7 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly requires checking that supplied parameters/fields have valid (non-missing) values before they are used.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and null/missing-value handling during coding and review.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.26 only requires that security requirements (including input validation per item j) be identified and specified during development or acquisition; it does not itself enforce, implement or assure correct handling of missing values, so the weakness can still be present and exploitable.

prevents

Secure coding standards can require validation that every supplied parameter has a non-null value.

finds

Security testing can detect missing-value flaws but does not itself prevent them.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (4 rules)
  • V-248714 OL 8 must not allow accounts configured with blank or null passwords. blocks CWE-230
  • V-248715 OL 8 must not allow blank or null passwords in the system-auth file. blocks CWE-230
  • V-248716 OL 8 must not allow blank or null passwords in the password-auth file. blocks CWE-230
RHEL 7 (1 rule)
  • V-204424 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must not allow accounts configured with blank or null passwords. blocks CWE-230
Ubuntu 24.04 (1 rule)
  • V-270714 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS must not allow accounts configured in Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM) with blank or null passwords. blocks CWE-230

References