Security Resilience

CVE-2024-0805

Fedoraproject Fedora 38 … 39

Published
24 January 2024
Modified
20 June 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0039 31th percentile
Risk Priority 37 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-0805 is a medium-severity User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information (CWE-451) vulnerability in Fedoraproject Fedora. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 31th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A06:2025 Insecure Design

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Inappropriate implementation in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 121.0.6167.85 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted domain name. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

CWE(s)
NVD-CWE-noinfoCWE-451

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-2631Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-4950Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-0807Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2023-4427Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2021-30554Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-3914Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-5831Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-5836Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-2627Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-1284Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora

Affected Assets

google
chrome
≤ 121.0.6167.85
fedoraproject
fedora
38, 39

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.6.3 Information security awareness, education and training partial match
blocks

A.6.3 is awareness/education/training that informs people of their responsibilities and improves skills; it does not stop a UI misrepresentation weakness from remaining present or from being exploitable (e.g. in phishing).

A.8.23 Web filtering partial match
degrades

Web filtering can block known phishing sites that exploit UI misrepresentation.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
blocks

Secure development lifecycle includes UI/UX security requirements that can prevent misrepresentation of critical information.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
blocks

A.8.26 only requires that security requirements (including some that could indirectly relate to UI trustworthiness) be identified and specified during development; it does not itself enforce, implement, or stop UI misrepresentation from being exploitable.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding practices can prevent UI flaws that obscure or spoof critical information.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance partial match
finds

Security testing can detect UI misrepresentation vulnerabilities before deployment.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-451, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References