Security Resilience

CVE-2024-10569

Gradio Project Gradio 2024-09-18

Public PoC
Published
20 March 2025
Modified
07 October 2025
CVSS Score v3 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0066 51th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-10569 is a high-severity Undefined Behavior for Input to API (CWE-475) vulnerability in Gradio Project Gradio. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Protocol or Service Impersonation (T1001.003); ranked in the top 49% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as Machine Learning Libraries; in the Data-Related Vulnerabilities risk domain.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability in the dataframe component of gradio-app/gradio (version git 98cbcae) allows for a zip bomb attack. The component uses pd.read_csv to process input values, which can accept compressed files. An attacker can exploit this by uploading a maliciously crafted…

more

zip bomb, leading to a server crash and causing a denial of service.

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
Machine Learning Libraries
Risk Domain
Data-Related Vulnerabilities
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
Matched keywords: gradio

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001.003 Protocol or Service Impersonation Command And Control
Adversaries may impersonate legitimate protocols or web service traffic to disguise command and control activity and thwart analysis efforts.
T1003 OS Credential Dumping Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to dump credentials to obtain account login and credential material, normally in the form of a hash or a clear text password.
T1003.004 LSA Secrets Credential Access
Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.
T1003.006 DCSync Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credentials and other sensitive information by abusing a Windows Domain Controller's application programming interface (API)(Citation: Microsoft DRSR Dec 2017) (Citation: Microsoft GetNCCChanges) (Citati…
T1003.007 Proc Filesystem Credential Access
Adversaries may gather credentials from the proc filesystem or `/proc`.
T1005 Data from Local System Collection
Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-1728Same product: Gradio Project Gradio
CVE-2024-4941Same product: Gradio Project Gradio
CVE-2024-1727Same product: Gradio Project Gradio
CVE-2026-10783Same product: Gradio Project Gradio
CVE-2023-25823Same product: Gradio Project Gradio
CVE-2024-2206Same product: Gradio Project Gradio
CVE-2024-1729Same product: Gradio Project Gradio
CVE-2024-4254Same product: Gradio Project Gradio
CVE-2024-4253Same product: Gradio Project Gradio
CVE-2024-4940Same product: Gradio Project Gradio

Affected Assets

gradio project
gradio
2024-09-18

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover calls that supply invalid control-parameter values before deployment.

Validating inputs to API control parameters ensures only permitted values are supplied, structurally eliminating the source of undefined behavior.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

ID.RA-01 partial match
blocks

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record this class of API-related weakness.

PR.PS-06 partial match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices (coding standards, reviews, testing) directly prevent undefined behavior from invalid API inputs.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Secure development lifecycle includes API specification and validation that can prevent undefined behavior from invalid inputs.

blocks

A.8.26 only requires that security requirements (including resilience against attacks such as buffer overflows or SQL injection) be identified and specified during development or acquisition; it does not itself enforce, implement, or prevent the undefined-behavior weakness from arising or being exploitable.

blocks

A.8.27 establishes and applies secure engineering principles (including least privilege, security by design, and distrusting external input) during architecture and development, but does not stop an already-written API from exhibiting undefined behavior on non-specific input values; the weakness remains present and exploitable.

prevents

Secure coding directly addresses avoiding undefined behavior by enforcing defined inputs and error handling in APIs.

finds

Security testing can detect undefined behavior from invalid API inputs before deployment.

References