Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-10576

Published
04 December 2024
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 9.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:X/R:I/V:D/RE:X/U:Amber
EPSS Score 0.0016 6th percentile
Risk Priority 36 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-10576 is a critical-severity Improper Verification of Intent by Broadcast Receiver (CWE-925) vulnerability in Cert (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 9.4 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Inter-Process Communication (T1559); ranked at the 6th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and IA-9 (Service Identification and Authentication) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Infinix devices contain a pre-loaded "com.transsion.agingfunction" application, that exposes an unsecured broadcast receiver. An attacker can communicate with the receiver and force the device to perform a factory reset without any Android system permissions. After multiple attempts to contact the…

more

vendor we did not receive any answer. We suppose this issue affects all Infinix Mobile devices.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1559 Inter-Process Communication Execution
Adversaries may abuse inter-process communication (IPC) mechanisms for local code or command execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-44126Shared CWE-925
CVE-2026-33173Shared CWE-925

Affected Assets

Cert
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Access enforcement requires the receiver to check authorizations on incoming intents before acting, directly stopping unauthorized sources from succeeding.

Service identification and authentication forces the receiver to verify the sending service or component before accepting the intent.

Information flow enforcement mandates validating the origin of each message before allowing processing, preventing the exact flaw described.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 full match
prevents

Secure development practices include explicit sender verification for broadcast receivers.

PR.AA-03 mostly match
prevents

Verifying sender identity directly prevents unauthorized broadcast Intents.

PR.AA-04 mostly match
prevents

Verifying identity assertions implements the missing authorization check for received Intents.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Enforcing authorization policy for the receiver mitigates the improper verification flaw.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing intent verification but does not prevent the weakness by itself.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate intent verification for broadcast receivers.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include proper component authorization and input validation.

prevents

Secure coding practices directly address proper intent verification in broadcast receivers.

References