Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-13158

Path Traversal in Ivanti Endpoint Manager ≤ 2024

Published
14 January 2025
Modified
12 August 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.035 88th percentile
Risk Priority 71 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-13158 is a high-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Ivanti Endpoint Manager. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked in the top 12% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and CM-6 (Configuration Settings) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-13158 is an unbounded resource search path vulnerability affecting Ivanti EPM prior to the 2024 January-2025 Security Update and the 2022 SU6 January-2025 Security Update. The flaw, tracked under CWE-22 and CWE-426, permits a remote authenticated attacker to manipulate search paths and ultimately execute arbitrary code on the affected system.

An attacker with administrative privileges can exploit the issue over the network without user interaction to obtain remote code execution, resulting in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability as reflected in the CVSS 7.2 score.

The referenced Ivanti security advisory directs customers to apply the January 2025 updates for both the 2024 and 2022 SU6 releases to address the vulnerability.

The EPSS score for this CVE rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.3920 before settling at the current value of 0.2696, indicating that exploitation interest increased after public disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An unbounded resource search path in Ivanti EPM before the 2024 January-2025 Security Update and 2022 SU6 January-2025 Security Update allows a remote authenticated attacker with admin privileges to achieve remote code execution.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
T1574 Hijack Execution Flow Stealth
Adversaries may execute their own malicious payloads by hijacking the way operating systems run programs.
T1574.001 DLL Stealth
Adversaries may abuse dynamic-link library files (DLLs) in order to achieve persistence, escalate privileges, and evade defenses.
T1574.008 Path Interception by Search Order Hijacking Stealth
Adversaries may execute their own malicious payloads by hijacking the search order used to load other programs.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1574.007 Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable Stealth
Adversaries may execute their own malicious payloads by hijacking environment variables used to load libraries.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-34787Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2024-50324Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2024-50322Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2024-50329Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2025-9713Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2025-13661Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2024-10811Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2023-32563Same vendor: Ivanti
CVE-2024-24999Same vendor: Ivanti
CVE-2024-13180Same vendor: Ivanti

Affected Assets

ivanti
endpoint manager
2022 · ≤ 2024

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Secure baseline settings can enforce absolute, organization-controlled paths for critical resources.

Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.

Least-functionality configuration can prohibit unapproved directories or executables from being reachable via search paths.

Engineering principles such as trusted paths, complete mediation, and least privilege directly require hard-coded or validated search paths instead of external ones.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-05 full match
prevents

Preventing execution of unauthorized code directly blocks the malicious binaries that an untrusted search path would load.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices include avoiding or sanitizing externally influenced search paths in application code.

PR.PS-01 partial match
prevents

Hardened configuration baselines can enforce safe search paths and restrict environment variables that enable the weakness.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

degrades

Restricting software installation reduces the chance that untrusted binaries or libraries are placed in search paths.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

References