Security Resilience

CVE-2024-13274

Getopensocial Open Social ≤ 12.3.8

Published
09 January 2025
Modified
25 August 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0036 28th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-13274 is a medium-severity Improper Control of Interaction Frequency (CWE-799) vulnerability in Getopensocial Open Social. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 28th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-10 (Concurrent Session Control) and AC-7 (Unsuccessful Logon Attempts) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper Control of Interaction Frequency vulnerability in Drupal Open Social allows Functionality Misuse.This issue affects Open Social: from 0.0.0 before 12.3.8, from 12.4.0 before 12.4.5.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-48921Same product: Getopensocial Open Social
CVE-2024-13241Same product: Getopensocial Open Social
CVE-2024-13273Same product: Getopensocial Open Social
CVE-2025-31686Same product: Getopensocial Open Social
CVE-2024-13312Same product: Getopensocial Open Social
CVE-2024-13240Same product: Getopensocial Open Social
CVE-2025-31685Same product: Getopensocial Open Social
CVE-2025-48016Shared CWE-799
CVE-2026-7402Shared CWE-799
CVE-2023-2758Shared CWE-799

Affected Assets

getopensocial
open social
≤ 12.3.8 · 12.4.0 — 12.4.5

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

ac-10 enforces a hard limit on concurrent sessions per user, directly stopping uncontrolled interaction frequency at the session level.

ac-7 directly enforces a limit on the frequency of invalid authentication attempts, structurally preventing the weakness for that interaction class.

sc-5 reduces the impact of excessive request volume (DoS) but does not itself impose the frequency controls whose absence defines the weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly include controls on interaction frequency and throttling.

blocks

Secure architecture principles recommend rate-limiting and resource-management mechanisms.

prevents

Secure coding practices can embed input-frequency and throttling checks in code.

degrades

Capacity management directly limits request rates and resource exhaustion that CWE-799 describes.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-799, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-307.

References