Security Resilience

CVE-2024-1552

Mozilla Firefox ≤ 115.8.0

Published
20 February 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0067 51th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-1552 is a high-severity Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types (CWE-681) vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Junk Data (T1001.001); ranked in the top 49% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Incorrect code generation could have led to unexpected numeric conversions and potential undefined behavior.*Note:* This issue only affects 32-bit ARM devices. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 123, Firefox ESR < 115.8, and Thunderbird < 115.8.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001.001 Junk Data Command And Control
Adversaries may add junk data to protocols used for command and control to make detection more difficult.
T1001.002 Steganography Command And Control
Adversaries may use steganographic techniques to hide command and control traffic to make detection efforts more difficult.
T1003.002 Security Account Manager Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to extract credential material from the Security Account Manager (SAM) database either through in-memory techniques or through the Windows Registry where the SAM database is stored.
T1003.004 LSA Secrets Credential Access
Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.
T1006 Direct Volume Access Stealth
Adversaries may directly access a volume to bypass file access controls and file system monitoring.
T1008 Fallback Channels Command And Control
Adversaries may use fallback or alternate communication channels if the primary channel is compromised or inaccessible in order to maintain reliable command and control and to avoid data transfer thresholds.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-53133Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-3859Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-4777Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-4767Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-5696Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-2614Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-2608Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-1547Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-1546Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-1550Same product: Debian Debian Linux

Affected Assets

mozilla
firefox
≤ 115.8.0 · ≤ 123.0
mozilla
thunderbird
≤ 115.8.0
debian
debian linux
10.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover incorrect numeric conversions through targeted test cases.

Engineering principles can mandate safe numeric handling and range checks that structurally avoid bad conversions.

Input validation directly stops malformed or out-of-range numeric values from reaching conversion logic.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices directly require code reviews, static analysis, and developer training that catch and prevent numeric type-conversion errors.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

Secure development lifecycle includes type-safety and conversion checks that reduce numeric truncation risks.

blocks

A.8.26 requires identifying and specifying security requirements (including resilience against certain attacks like buffer overflows or SQL injection) but does not itself implement any conversion checks, bounds validation, or other mechanisms that would stop exploitation of incorrect numeric type conversions

blocks

Secure architecture principles promote strong typing and safe conversion practices.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address correct numeric type conversions and overflow checks.

finds

Security testing can detect numeric conversion defects before release.

References