Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-1672

Fedoraproject Fedora 38 … 39

Public PoC
Published
21 February 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 5.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0088 56th percentile
Risk Priority 45 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-1672 is a medium-severity Use of Function with Inconsistent Implementations (CWE-474) vulnerability in Fedoraproject Fedora. Its CVSS base score is 5.4 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked in the top 44% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Inappropriate implementation in Content Security Policy in Google Chrome prior to 122.0.6261.57 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-5839Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-2628Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-5836Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-3833Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-2885Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-4761Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-1669Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2024-0805Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2021-21206Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2021-21220Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora

Affected Assets

google
chrome
≤ 122.0.6261.57
fedoraproject
fedora
38, 39

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing across OS versions can reveal behavioral differences caused by the inconsistent function.

Documented development standards and tools can prohibit or replace functions known to have inconsistent implementations.

Engineering principles can require use of portable, consistently implemented functions across platforms.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce coding standards and portability reviews that avoid functions with inconsistent behavior across platforms.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can surface cross-platform inconsistencies but does not prevent their introduction in code.

prevents

Secure SDLC requires consistent API selection and platform abstraction, reducing use of inconsistently implemented functions.

degrades

Secure architecture principles include portable abstractions and avoiding platform-specific calls with divergent behavior.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly prohibit or wrap functions known to behave differently across OSes and versions.

References