Security Resilience

CVE-2024-20069

Mediatek Nr15

Published
03 June 2024
Modified
25 April 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0057 46th percentile
Risk Priority 52 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-20069 is a medium-severity Algorithm Downgrade (CWE-757) vulnerability in Mediatek Nr15. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique OS Credential Dumping (T1003); ranked at the 46th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-13 (Cryptographic Protection) and SC-8 (Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In modem, there is a possible selection of less-secure algorithm during the VoWiFi IKE due to a missing DH downgrade check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

more

exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01286330; Issue ID: MSV-1430.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1003 OS Credential Dumping Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to dump credentials to obtain account login and credential material, normally in the form of a hash or a clear text password.
T1003.005 Cached Domain Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access cached domain credentials used to allow authentication to occur in the event a domain controller is unavailable.
T1003.006 DCSync Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credentials and other sensitive information by abusing a Windows Domain Controller's application programming interface (API)(Citation: Microsoft DRSR Dec 2017) (Citation: Microsoft GetNCCChanges) (Citati…
T1006 Direct Volume Access Stealth
Adversaries may directly access a volume to bypass file access controls and file system monitoring.
T1007 System Service Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may try to gather information about registered local system services.
T1016 System Network Configuration Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may look for details about the network configuration and settings, such as IP and/or MAC addresses, of systems they access or through information discovery of remote systems.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-20094Same product: Mediatek Mt6833
CVE-2026-20401Same product: Mediatek Mt6833
CVE-2026-20402Same product: Mediatek Mt6833
CVE-2025-20791Same product: Mediatek Mt6833
CVE-2025-20757Same product: Mediatek Mt6833
CVE-2025-20751Same product: Mediatek Mt6833
CVE-2025-20755Same product: Mediatek Mt6833
CVE-2025-20750Same product: Mediatek Mt6833
CVE-2025-20790Same product: Mediatek Mt6833
CVE-2024-20004Same product: Mediatek Mt6833

Affected Assets

mediatek
nr15
all versions

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 5 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V12.1.1
  • V12.2.1
  • V12.3.3
  • V17.2.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Specifying and implementing required cryptography types directly precludes negotiation or acceptance of weaker algorithms.

Requiring protection of transmitted confidentiality and integrity forces selection of sufficiently strong negotiated algorithms rather than weaker ones.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-04 none match
blocks

PR.AA-04 addresses protection/verification of identity assertions in SSO/federation contexts while CWE-757 concerns protocol-level crypto algorithm negotiation, so the control neither prevents nor meaningfully mitigates the weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.8.24 requires selecting strong approved algorithms per policy and classification (b,f), which can stop downgrade by mandating only-strong options; but the weakness lives in the negotiation protocol/implementation itself, and the clause does not reach or alter that design, leaving a bounded remainder (e.g. protocol-level downgrade attacks even with approved ciphers).

blocks

Secure SDLC practices include selecting strong crypto algorithms during design and implementation.

blocks

Application security requirements can specify minimum cryptographic strength to avoid downgrades.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (including least functionality, assume-breach, distrust-external-input, and selection of strong cryptography) plus design reviews against known attack patterns; this reaches the subset of algorithm-downgrade flaws that arise from missing or misapplied protocol-level choices, but leaves the dominant implementation-time and negotiation-logic cases (e.g. library defaults, missing minimum-strength enforcement) untouched.

prevents

Secure coding standards can mandate checks to reject weaker negotiated algorithms.

finds

Security testing can detect and block algorithm downgrade vulnerabilities before deployment.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Windows 10 (1 rule)
  • V-220938 The LanMan authentication level must be set to send NTLMv2 response only, and to refuse LM and NTLM. blocks CWE-757
Windows Server 2016 (1 rule)
  • V-225054 The LAN Manager authentication level must be set to send NTLMv2 response only and to refuse LM and NTLM. blocks CWE-757
Windows Server 2019 (1 rule)
  • V-205919 Windows Server 2019 LAN Manager authentication level must be configured to send NTLMv2 response only and to refuse LM and NTLM. blocks CWE-757

References