Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-20431

Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense 7.0.0 … 7.4.1.1

Published
23 October 2024
Modified
11 August 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0040 33th percentile
Risk Priority 46 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-20431 is a medium-severity Improper Handling of Values (CWE-229) vulnerability in Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense. Its CVSS base score is 5.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 33th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability in the geolocation access control feature of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass an access control policy. This vulnerability is due to improper assignment of geolocation data. An attacker could…

more

exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a geolocation-based access control policy and successfully send traffic to a protected device.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
T1687 Exploitation for Defense Impairment Defense Impairment
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities in security software, infrastructure, or defensive components to degrade, disable, or otherwise continue to impair their ability to prevent, detect, or respond to malicious activity.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-20270Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
CVE-2026-20017Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
CVE-2026-20050Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
CVE-2023-20267Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
CVE-2024-20261Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
CVE-2023-20083Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
CVE-2023-20031Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
CVE-2023-20177Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
CVE-2023-20070Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense
CVE-2024-20351Same product: Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense

Affected Assets

cisco
secure firewall threat defense
7.0.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.1, 7.0.1.1, 7.0.2

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly enforces correct handling of parameter counts and defined values before processing occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper input validation and parameter handling to prevent this weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing-value flaws but does not itself implement the handling logic.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes input validation and parameter handling requirements that reduce missing-value errors.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for validation of all input parameters and fields.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage robust input handling but do not directly specify value-count checks.

prevents

Secure coding standards mandate proper handling of missing or undefined parameters, directly addressing this weakness.

References