Security Resilience

CVE-2024-22458

Crypto Weakness in Dell Secure Connect Gateway 5.18.00.20 … 5.20.00.10

Published
01 March 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 3.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0013 2th percentile
Risk Priority 30 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-22458 is a low-severity Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm (CWE-327) vulnerability in Dell Secure Connect Gateway. Its CVSS base score is 3.7 (Low).

Operationally, ranked at the 2th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-13 (Cryptographic Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Dell Secure Connect Gateway, 5.18, contains an Inadequate Encryption Strength Vulnerability. An unauthenticated network attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, allowing an attacker to recover plaintext from a block of ciphertext.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-28043Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway
CVE-2024-48016Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway
CVE-2023-23695Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway
CVE-2026-78485Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway
CVE-2026-78480Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway
CVE-2024-51539Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway
CVE-2026-80129Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway
CVE-2026-80123Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway
CVE-2026-80127Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway
CVE-2026-79639Same product: Dell Secure Connect Gateway

Affected Assets

dell
secure connect gateway
5.18.00.20, 5.20.00.10

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SC-13 requires selection and implementation of specific cryptography types, directly stopping use of broken algorithms.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.5.31 only requires identifying, reviewing and considering legal/regulatory/contractual requirements (including crypto restrictions); it does not itself stop use of a broken algorithm or block its exploitation

blocks

A.5.6 only promotes membership in groups to receive early warnings, advisories, and specialist advice about vulnerabilities (including risky crypto); it does not stop exploitation of an already-present broken algorithm, which requires other controls (e.g. A.8.24) to act.

blocks

A.8.24's policy, algorithm selection, strength/quality rules, approved standards and key management directly stop use of broken/risky algorithms in most cases; the bounded remainder is non-compliant implementations or legacy systems grandfathered under the clause's own regulatory and transition guidance.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-327, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-328, CWE-780, CWE-1240.

References