Security Resilience

CVE-2024-23141

Memory Safety in Autodesk Autocad 2022 – 2022.1.5

Published
25 June 2024
Modified
31 December 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0042 34th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-23141 is a high-severity Double Free (CWE-415) vulnerability in Autodesk Autocad. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Steganography (T1001.002); ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed in libodxdll through Autodesk applications, can cause a double free. This vulnerability, along with other vulnerabilities, can lead to code execution in the current process.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001.002 Steganography Command And Control
Adversaries may use steganographic techniques to hide command and control traffic to make detection efforts more difficult.
T1001.003 Protocol or Service Impersonation Command And Control
Adversaries may impersonate legitimate protocols or web service traffic to disguise command and control activity and thwart analysis efforts.
T1003.001 LSASS Memory Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credential material stored in the process memory of the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS).
T1003.002 Security Account Manager Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to extract credential material from the Security Account Manager (SAM) database either through in-memory techniques or through the Windows Registry where the SAM database is stored.
T1003.004 LSA Secrets Credential Access
Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.
T1003.008 /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to dump the contents of <code>/etc/passwd</code> and <code>/etc/shadow</code> to enable offline password cracking.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-36999Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2024-23143Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2024-23154Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2024-23155Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2024-37001Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-1429Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-1651Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2024-23127Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-1430Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-1650Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel

Affected Assets

autodesk
autocad
2022 — 2022.1.5 · 2023 — 2023.1.6 · 2024 — 2024.1.4
autodesk
autocad architecture
2022 — 2022.1.5 · 2023 — 2023.1.6 · 2024 — 2024.1.4
autodesk
autocad electrical
2022 — 2022.1.5 · 2023 — 2023.1.6 · 2024 — 2024.1.4
autodesk
autocad map 3d
2022 — 2022.1.5 · 2023 — 2023.1.6 · 2024 — 2024.1.4
autodesk
autocad mechanical
2022 — 2022.1.5 · 2023 — 2023.1.6 · 2024 — 2024.1.4
autodesk
autocad mep
2022 — 2022.1.5 · 2023 — 2023.1.6 · 2024 — 2024.1.4
autodesk
autocad plant 3d
2022 — 2022.1.5 · 2023 — 2023.1.6 · 2024 — 2024.1.4
autodesk
civil 3d
2022 — 2022.1.5 · 2023 — 2023.1.6 · 2024 — 2024.1.4
autodesk
advance steel
2022 — 2022.1.5 · 2023 — 2023.1.6 · 2024 — 2024.1.4

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation explicitly includes dynamic analysis and fuzzing that locate double-free defects before release.

Security engineering principles can require memory-safe allocation patterns or language features that structurally eliminate double-free opportunities.

Flaw remediation processes require identification and correction of memory-management defects such as double free once discovered.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent double-free errors via static analysis, safe memory APIs, and testing.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

removes
removes
removes
removes

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248590 OL 8 must clear the page allocator to prevent use-after-free attacks. blocks CWE-415

References