Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-23350

Qualcomm Wsa8845H Firmware

Published
05 August 2024
Modified
26 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0017 7th percentile
Risk Priority 48 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-23350 is a medium-severity Reachable Assertion (CWE-617) vulnerability in Qualcomm Wsa8845H Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004); ranked at the 7th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Permanent DOS when DL NAS transport receives multiple payloads such that one payload contains SOR container whose integrity check has failed, and the other is LPP where UE needs to send status message to network.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499.004 Application or System Exploitation Impact
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities that can cause an application or system to crash and deny availability to users.
T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-23385Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2023-33095Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2023-33096Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2025-47371Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2025-47370Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2023-43523Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2023-43529Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2025-27073Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2023-33041Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035
CVE-2023-33043Same product: Qualcomm Ar8035

Affected Assets

qualcomm
wsa8845h firmware
all versions
qualcomm
wsa8845 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
wsa8840 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
wcd9395 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
wcd9390 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
wcd9340 firmware
all versions
qualcomm
snapdragon x75 5g modem-rf system firmware
all versions
qualcomm
snapdragon x72 5g modem-rf system firmware
all versions
qualcomm
snapdragon x35 5g modem-rf system firmware
all versions
qualcomm
snapdragon auto 5g modem-rf gen 2 firmware
all versions
+15 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation finds reachable assertions during development.

Security engineering principles discourage use of assertions for handling untrusted input.

Validating untrusted inputs structurally prevents attacker data from reaching and triggering assertions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent unsafe assertions from being coded in reachable paths.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software can detect assertion-triggered crashes as adverse events.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record reachable-assertion flaws before deployment.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect reachable assertions before release, reducing the likelihood of exploitation.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates defensive coding and input validation that prevent reachable assertions from being triggered by untrusted data.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify that assertions must not be reachable from attacker-controlled inputs.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage the use of assertions for runtime error handling that an attacker could exploit.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly ban the use of assert() or equivalent statements that can be triggered by external input.

References