Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-25420

Igniterealtime Openfire ≤ 4.9.0

Public PoC
Published
26 March 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.014 71th percentile
Risk Priority 56 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-25420 is a high-severity Improper Check for Dropped Privileges (CWE-273) vulnerability in Igniterealtime Openfire. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Access Token Manipulation (T1134); ranked in the top 29% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An issue in Ignite Realtime Openfire before 4.8.1 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the admin.authorizedJIDs system property component.

CWE(s)
CWE-273

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1134 Access Token Manipulation Stealth
Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls.
attack.mitre.org →
T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may circumvent mechanisms designed to control privilege elevation to gain higher-level permissions.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-25421Same product: Igniterealtime Openfire
CVE-2023-32315Same product: Igniterealtime Openfire
CVE-2026-44073Shared CWE-273
CVE-2025-27396Shared CWE-273
CVE-2023-5369Shared CWE-273
CVE-2023-34322Shared CWE-273
CVE-2023-0657Shared CWE-273
CVE-2023-26239Shared CWE-273
CVE-2026-0099Shared CWE-273
CVE-2011-2921Shared CWE-273

Affected Assets

igniterealtime
openfire
≤ 4.9.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

AC-6 Least Privilege partial match

Employing least privilege requires that privilege-dropping operations succeed and are verified before continuing.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC activities (code review, static analysis, testing) catch missing or incorrect privilege-drop checks, but eliminating only this one flaw covers only a fraction of the control's broader intent.

PR.AA-05 partial match
prevents

Least-privilege policy and enforcement directly motivate privilege-dropping code, yet the control does not address implementation-level verification of the drop.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing can detect failed privilege drops, yet the control does not require such checks as part of its core intent.

A.8.18 Use of privileged utility programs partial match
degrades

Control of privileged utility programs includes ensuring privilege-dropping operations are verified before use.

A.8.2 Privileged access rights partial match
degrades

Privileged access rights policy requires verification that privilege changes succeed, directly addressing failed privilege drops.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding practices can prevent missing privilege-drop checks, but the control itself does not mandate verification of privilege changes.

References