Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-26005

Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000 Firmware ≤ 1.5.1

Published
12 March 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 4.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0062 47th percentile
Risk Priority 40 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-26005 is a medium-severity Incomplete Cleanup (CWE-459) vulnerability in Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 4.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data from Local System (T1005); ranked at the 47th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-14 (Non-persistence) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An unauthenticated remote attacker can gain service level privileges through an incomplete cleanup during service restart after a DoS. 

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1005 Data from Local System Collection
Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.
T1552 Unsecured Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may search compromised systems to find and obtain insecurely stored credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-3913Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000
CVE-2024-25994Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000
CVE-2025-25268Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000
CVE-2024-28133Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000
CVE-2024-28134Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000
CVE-2025-24006Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000
CVE-2024-25999Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000
CVE-2024-28137Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000
CVE-2025-24005Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000
CVE-2024-26003Same product: Phoenixcontact Charx Sec-3000

Affected Assets

phoenixcontact
charx sec-3000 firmware
≤ 1.5.1
phoenixcontact
charx sec-3050 firmware
≤ 1.5.1
phoenixcontact
charx sec-3100 firmware
≤ 1.5.1
phoenixcontact
charx sec-3150 firmware
≤ 1.5.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V6.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover incomplete cleanup through dynamic analysis or resource-leak testing.

Non-persistence mechanisms explicitly initiate resources in a known state and terminate them, directly enforcing cleanup.

Session termination forces explicit release of session-related temporary resources.

Preventing unintended information transfer through shared resources requires complete cleanup of those resources.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices and coding standards normally require proper resource release and cleanup.

ID.AM-08 partial match
prevents

Life-cycle management encompasses disposal of temporary resources but does not specifically target runtime cleanup bugs.

PR.DS-10 partial match
prevents

Explicitly calls for removing sensitive data after use, directly addressing one class of incomplete cleanup.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Explicitly requires secure deletion of temporary or residual data, directly addressing incomplete cleanup.

prevents

SDLC practices include cleanup steps, yet the weakness can still occur if those steps are omitted.

prevents

Secure-coding rules can mandate explicit cleanup of temporary resources, but do not guarantee it.

finds

Change-management processes may require cleanup verification, but the control itself does not address the weakness.

References