Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-27662

Dlink Dir-823G Firmware 1.0.2b05

Public PoC
Published
29 February 2024
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0043 35th percentile
Risk Priority 50 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-27662 is a medium-severity Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions (CWE-755) vulnerability in Dlink Dir-823G Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203); ranked at the 35th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SC-24 (Fail in Known State) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

D-Link DIR-823G A1V1.0.2B05 was discovered to contain a Null-pointer dereferences in sub_4110f4(). This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1489 Service Stop Impact
Adversaries may stop or disable services on a system to render those services unavailable to legitimate users.
T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-27659Same product: Dlink Dir-823G
CVE-2024-33345Same product: Dlink Dir-823G
CVE-2025-60332Same product: Dlink Dir-823G
CVE-2024-27661Same product: Dlink Dir-823G
CVE-2024-27658Same product: Dlink Dir-823G
CVE-2023-44830Same product: Dlink Dir-823G
CVE-2023-44832Same product: Dlink Dir-823G
CVE-2023-44838Same product: Dlink Dir-823G
CVE-2024-27656Same product: Dlink Dir-823G
CVE-2024-27657Same product: Dlink Dir-823G

Affected Assets

dlink
dir-823g firmware
1.0.2b05

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover catch blocks used for null detection during code review or dynamic analysis.

Requires the system to fail to a known safe state on specified failures, limiting the impact of unhandled exceptional conditions.

Mandates explicit fail-safe procedures triggered by indicated failures, structurally preventing unhandled or mishandled exceptional conditions.

Documented development standards and tools can mandate explicit null checks instead of relying on exception handlers.

Requires generation of appropriate error messages on exceptional conditions, directly enforcing correct handling rather than silent or incorrect behavior.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices explicitly require proper exception and error handling during design and coding.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance verifies correct handling of exceptional conditions.

degrades

Documented operating procedures may specify exception handling but do not guarantee implementation.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging captures unhandled exceptions, aiding detection but not preventing the weakness.

finds

Monitoring can surface unhandled exceptions but does not enforce proper handling.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates exception-handling requirements and testing that directly prevent improper handling of exceptional conditions.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly include handling of error and exceptional conditions.

References