Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-30004

Memory Safety in Microsoft Windows 10 1809 ≤ 10.0.17763.5820

Published
14 May 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0089 56th percentile
Risk Priority 52 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-30004 is a medium-severity Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190) vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 10 1809. Its CVSS base score is 6.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 44% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-30021Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-30005Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-29999Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-20698Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-30001Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-29997Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-30003Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-30000Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-30012Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809
CVE-2024-38215Same product: Microsoft Windows 10 1809

Affected Assets

microsoft
windows 10 1809
≤ 10.0.17763.5820
microsoft
windows 10 21h2
≤ 10.0.19044.4412
microsoft
windows 10 22h2
≤ 10.0.19045.4412
microsoft
windows 11 21h2
≤ 10.0.22000.2960
microsoft
windows 11 22h2
≤ 10.0.22621.3593
microsoft
windows 11 23h2
≤ 10.0.22631.3593
microsoft
windows server 2019
≤ 10.0.17763.5820
microsoft
windows server 2022
≤ 10.0.20348.2458
microsoft
windows server 2022 23h2
≤ 10.0.25398.887

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (static analysis, fuzzing, unit tests) directly finds integer overflow defects before deployment.

Secure engineering principles require use of safe arithmetic constructs or language features that structurally eliminate integer overflow during calculation.

Input validation enforces bounds on values before arithmetic, stopping the conditions that trigger overflow or wraparound.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require use of safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and testing that prevent integer overflows.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect integer overflows before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and arithmetic checks that prevent integer overflows.

degrades

Application security requirements include bounds checking and safe arithmetic to avoid overflow conditions.

degrades

Secure architecture principles require defensive coding patterns that mitigate integer wraparound risks.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe integer operations and mandate overflow-safe constructs.

References