CVE-2024-30924
Derbynet ≤ 9.0
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:NSummary
CVE-2024-30924 is a medium-severity Incomplete Denylist to Cross-Site Scripting (CWE-692) vulnerability in Derbynet Derbynet. Its CVSS base score is 4.6 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked at the 27th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-28842
Vulnerability Data
Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in DerbyNet v9.0 and below allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via the checkin.php component.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Input validation requires complete, allowlist-style checks that structurally eliminate reliance on incomplete XSS denylists.
Security engineering principles mandate robust sanitization and validation approaches that avoid incomplete denylist patterns.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require robust input validation and sanitization (e.g., allowlists) rather than incomplete denylists for XSS.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can discover incomplete denylists, yet the control does not mandate their replacement.
Secure-SDLC processes encourage proper input/output handling, but do not specifically address denylist shortcomings.
Application-security requirements can mandate proper output encoding, but the control itself does not prescribe the technique.
Secure-coding rules directly require allow-list or context-aware escaping instead of incomplete denylists for XSS.