CVE-2024-31197
Opennetworking Libfluid Msg 0.1.0
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NSummary
CVE-2024-31197 is a medium-severity Improper Null Termination (CWE-170) vulnerability in Opennetworking Libfluid Msg. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 25th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-29101
Vulnerability Data
Improper Null Termination vulnerability in Open Networking Foundation (ONF) libfluid (libfluid_msg module). This vulnerability is associated with program routine fluid_msg::of10::Port:unpack. This issue affects libfluid: 0.1.0.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect string termination during code review or dynamic analysis.
Requiring documented development standards and tools can enforce safe string-handling practices that produce correct null termination.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly enforce correct string/array termination via coding standards, reviews, and static analysis.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect missing or incorrect null terminators before release.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and string handling rules that prevent missing null terminators.
Application security requirements can explicitly call for proper string termination and buffer handling.
Secure architecture principles include defensive coding practices that address buffer and string termination issues.
Secure coding standards directly require correct null termination of strings and arrays.