Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-32118

Command Injection in Fortinet Fortianalyzer 6.2.0 – 7.2.6

Published
12 November 2024
Modified
17 January 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0061 46th percentile
Risk Priority 50 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-32118 is a medium-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Fortinet Fortianalyzer. Its CVSS base score is 6.7 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked at the 46th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-78] in Fortinet FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and before 7.2.5, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and before 7.2.5 and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer-BigData before 7.4.0…

more

allows an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted CLI requests.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-32123Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2023-42788Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2023-41838Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2024-40584Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2023-25607Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2024-48889Same product: Fortinet Fortimanager
CVE-2024-50566Same product: Fortinet Fortimanager
CVE-2024-23666Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2023-44254Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2024-33501Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer

Affected Assets

fortinet
fortianalyzer
6.2.0 — 7.2.6 · 7.4.0 — 7.4.3
fortinet
fortianalyzer big data
7.4.0 · 6.2.1 — 7.2.8
fortinet
fortimanager
6.2.0 — 7.2.6 · 7.4.0 — 7.4.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect command sanitization during development.

Input validation directly neutralizes or rejects special characters that would otherwise alter OS command structure.

Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.

Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.

Secure engineering principles require proper neutralization of untrusted input before command construction.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References