Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-32873

Evmos ≤ 18.0.0

Published
06 June 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 3.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0038 31th percentile
Risk Priority 31 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-32873 is a low-severity Incorrect Calculation (CWE-682) vulnerability in Evmos Evmos. Its CVSS base score is 3.5 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 31th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Evmos is the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) Hub on the Cosmos Network. The spendable balance is not updated properly when delegating vested tokens. The issue allows a clawback vesting account to anticipate the release of unvested tokens. This vulnerability is…

more

fixed in 18.0.0.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-39696Same product: Evmos Evmos
CVE-2024-37159Same product: Evmos Evmos
CVE-2024-37154Same product: Evmos Evmos
CVE-2024-32644Same product: Evmos Evmos
CVE-2024-37158Same product: Evmos Evmos
CVE-2024-37153Same product: Evmos Evmos
CVE-2026-24783Shared CWE-682
CVE-2024-42231Shared CWE-682
CVE-2026-44498Shared CWE-682
CVE-2024-25883Shared CWE-682

Affected Assets

evmos
evmos
≤ 18.0.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V15.2.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation directly exercises calculations and can discover incorrect or unintended results used in security decisions.

Requiring documented development processes and standards can enforce coding rules and tool usage that reduce introduction of calculation errors.

Engineering principles applied during design and implementation can require verified algorithms and safe arithmetic that structurally avoid incorrect calculation results.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent incorrect calculations via reviews, testing, and verification in security-critical code.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect calculation flaws before deployment.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates verification steps that catch incorrect calculations before they reach production.

prevents

Application security requirements can explicitly call for numeric accuracy and bounds checking.

degrades

Secure architecture principles include input validation and safe arithmetic design that reduce calculation errors.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prohibit unsafe arithmetic and require defensive checks against incorrect results.

References