Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-35136

Ibm Db2 10.5.0 – 10.5.11

Published
14 August 2024
Modified
04 November 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0055 43th percentile
Risk Priority 42 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-35136 is a medium-severity Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic (CWE-943) vulnerability in Ibm Db2. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes DB2 Connect Server) federated server 10.5, 11.1, and 11.5 is vulnerable to denial of service with a specially crafted query under certain non default conditions. IBM X-Force ID: 291307.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-36353Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-36185Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-36442Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-33114Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-36366Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-36365Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2024-31882Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-36247Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-36186Same product: Ibm Db2
CVE-2025-36184Same product: Ibm Db2

Affected Assets

ibm
db2
10.5.0 — 10.5.11 · 10.5.0 — 10.5.11 · 10.5.0 — 10.5.11

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly stops unneutralized special elements from reaching query logic.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require parameterized queries and input neutralization to prevent query-logic injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release but does not itself implement the fix.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and query parameterization that directly prevent injection flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection and improper query construction.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the likelihood of query-logic flaws but do not prescribe the specific coding practice.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper neutralization of special elements in all data queries.

prevents

Outsourced development agreements can require secure coding practices, indirectly mitigating the weakness.

References