Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-36618

Memory Safety in Ffmpeg 6.1.1

Memory Safety
Published
29 November 2024
Modified
03 November 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0024 16th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-36618 is a medium-severity Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190) vulnerability in Ffmpeg Ffmpeg. Its CVSS base score is 6.2 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 16th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

FFmpeg n6.1.1 has a vulnerability in the AVI demuxer of the libavformat library which allows for an integer overflow, potentially resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.

CWE(s)
CWE-190

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-22860Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg
CVE-2024-36616Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg
CVE-2024-22861Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg
CVE-2024-35366Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg
CVE-2024-22862Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg
CVE-2026-40962Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg
CVE-2024-36619Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg
CVE-2024-35369Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg
CVE-2025-63757Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg
CVE-2024-36617Same product: Ffmpeg Ffmpeg

Affected Assets

ffmpeg
ffmpeg
6.1.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require use of safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and testing that prevent integer overflows.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
detects

Security testing in development can detect integer overflows before release.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and arithmetic checks that prevent integer overflows.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
degrades

Application security requirements include bounds checking and safe arithmetic to avoid overflow conditions.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
degrades

Secure architecture principles require defensive coding patterns that mitigate integer wraparound risks.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe integer operations and mandate overflow-safe constructs.

References