Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-47181

Contiki-Ng ≤ 4.9

Published
27 November 2024
Modified
10 April 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0056 44th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-47181 is a high-severity Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast (CWE-704) vulnerability in Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 44th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Contiki-NG is an open-source, cross-platform operating system for IoT devices. An unaligned memory access can be triggered in the two RPL implementations of the Contiki-NG operating system. The problem can occur when either one of these RPL implementations is enabled…

more

and connected to an RPL instance. If an IPv6 packet containing an odd number of padded bytes before the RPL option, it can cause the rpl_ext_header_hbh_update function to read a 16-bit integer from an odd address. The impact of this unaligned read is architecture-dependent, but can potentially cause the system to crash. The problem has not been patched as of release 4.9, but will be included in the next release. One can apply the changes in Contiki-NG pull request #2962 to patch the system or wait for the next release.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
T1687 Exploitation for Defense Impairment Defense Impairment
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities in security software, infrastructure, or defensive components to degrade, disable, or otherwise continue to impair their ability to prevent, detect, or respond to malicious activity.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-23609Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng
CVE-2023-28116Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng
CVE-2023-48229Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng
CVE-2023-50926Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng
CVE-2023-30546Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng
CVE-2023-37281Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng
CVE-2024-41125Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng
CVE-2023-37459Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng
CVE-2023-34100Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng
CVE-2023-50927Same product: Contiki-Ng Contiki-Ng

Affected Assets

contiki-ng
contiki-ng
≤ 4.9

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (static analysis, fuzzing, unit tests) directly finds incorrect type conversions or casts.

Requiring documented development standards and tools can mandate safe typing, casting rules, and compiler checks that stop the weakness from being introduced.

Security engineering principles can require type-safe design and casting practices that structurally avoid incorrect conversions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent type-conversion flaws via coding standards, reviews, and testing.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can uncover type-conversion defects before release.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes type-safety reviews that reduce incorrect casts.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate strong typing and safe casting rules.

degrades

Secure architecture principles discourage unsafe type conversions in design.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly forbid or detect incorrect type casts.

References