Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-48848

Published
22 May 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v4 7.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0033 26th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-48848 is a high-severity Allocation of File Descriptors or Handles Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-774) vulnerability in Abb (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.0 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 26th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Large content vulnerabilities are present in ASPECT exposing a device to disk overutilization on a system if administrator credentials become compromisedThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.*; NEXUS Series: through 3.*; MATRIX Series: through 3.*.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.001 OS Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may launch a denial of service (DoS) attack targeting an endpoint's operating system (OS).
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-27887Shared CWE-774
CVE-2026-27204Shared CWE-774

Affected Assets

Abb
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SC-6 directly requires allocating resources (including file descriptors) according to quotas or limits, structurally preventing unbounded allocation.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices directly require resource-limit and throttling controls, preventing unbounded allocation by design.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying and recording resource-management vulnerabilities can surface missing allocation limits before deployment.

PR.IR-04 partial match
prevents

Capacity monitoring helps detect exhaustion but does not impose per-actor allocation limits at the code level.

PR.PS-01 partial match
prevents

Hardened configuration baselines can enforce OS-level descriptor/handle quotas that compensate for missing application limits.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly require limits on file-handle allocation.

finds

Security testing can detect unbounded descriptor allocation before release.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle requires resource-limit checks during design and coding.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate throttling and descriptor limits.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include resource-management controls to prevent exhaustion.

prevents

Capacity management directly limits resource allocation including file descriptors.

References