Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-49603

Dell Powerscale Onefs 9.8.0.0 – 9.9.0.1

Published
09 December 2024
Modified
20 February 2026
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0032 24th percentile
Risk Priority 36 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-49603 is a medium-severity Function Call With Incorrectly Specified Argument Value (CWE-687) vulnerability in Dell Powerscale Onefs. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 24th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Dell PowerScale OneFS Versions 8.2.2.x through 9.9.0.x contain an incorrect specified argument vulnerability. A remote low privileged legitimate user could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure.

CWE(s)
CWE-687NVD-CWE-Other

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-32492Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2025-26481Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2023-44295Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-25959Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-25961Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-42426Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-25952Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-47239Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-32854Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2025-43723Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs

Affected Assets

dell
powerscale onefs
9.8.0.0 — 9.9.0.1 · 8.2.2 — 9.7.1.3

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and evaluation activities can discover function calls that pass incorrect argument values.

SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools partial match

Requiring documented development processes and coding standards can reduce the introduction of incorrect argument values.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (reviews, static analysis, testing) directly catch incorrect argument values during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development can detect incorrect argument values before release.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes code review and testing that can catch incorrect argument values.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can mandate input validation and argument checking.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture principles promote defensive coding that reduces argument misuse.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding directly addresses correct function-call argument usage.

References