Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-54216

Reputeinfosystems Arforms ≤ 6.4.1

Published
06 December 2024
Modified
07 July 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0054 43th percentile
Risk Priority 56 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-54216 is a high-severity Path Traversal: '.../...//' (CWE-35) vulnerability in Reputeinfosystems Arforms. Its CVSS base score is 7.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data from Local System (T1005); ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Path Traversal: '.../...//' vulnerability in reputeinfosystems ARForms allows Path Traversal. This issue affects ARForms: from n/a before 7.0.2.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1005 Data from Local System Collection
Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.
T1083 File and Directory Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may enumerate files and directories or may search in specific locations of a host or network share for certain information within a file system.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-32706Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms
CVE-2024-32703Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms
CVE-2024-32704Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms
CVE-2024-0427Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms
CVE-2024-32702Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms
CVE-2024-4621Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms
CVE-2024-54217Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms
CVE-2024-32705Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms
CVE-2024-10504Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms
CVE-2024-4620Same product: Reputeinfosystems Arforms

Affected Assets

reputeinfosystems
arforms
≤ 6.4.1

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly neutralizes path sequences so the traversal cannot be introduced or exploited.

Enforces access authorizations on the resulting pathname, blocking traversal attempts from succeeding.

Enforces information flow rules that stop unauthorized directory escapes via crafted paths.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any successful traversal by limiting accessible resources.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and path sanitization that neutralize traversal sequences.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect path-traversal flaws before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path-handling controls that directly mitigate path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file-path construction and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require proper directory restrictions and input sanitization to prevent traversal.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path concatenation and mandate canonicalization routines.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits file reachability but does not address the input-validation flaw itself.

References