CVE-2024-54852
Sismics Teedy 1.9 – 1.12
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2024-54852 is a critical-severity LDAP Injection (CWE-90) vulnerability in Sismics Teedy. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 48% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2024-54852 is an LDAP injection vulnerability (CWE-90) in Teedy versions 1.9 through 1.12 when LDAP connection is activated. The flaw arises from improper sanitization of user input in the username field of the login form, enabling injection of malicious LDAP queries. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), reflecting critical severity due to its network accessibility and lack of prerequisites.
An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the vulnerability remotely by submitting crafted input to the login form's username field. Successful exploitation allows various malicious LDAP actions, including creating arbitrary accounts and performing password spraying.
Advisories and further details, including potential mitigation guidance, are available in the referenced GitHub repository at https://github.com/Tanguy-Boisset/CVE/blob/master/CVE-2024-54852/README.md.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-52685
Vulnerability Data
When LDAP connection is activated in Teedy versions between 1.9 to 1.12, the username field of the login form is vulnerable to LDAP injection. Due to improper sanitization of user input, an unauthenticated attacker is then able to perform various…
more
malicious actions, such as creating arbitrary accounts and spraying passwords.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.6
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover LDAP injection flaws through static analysis or crafted test cases.
Input validation directly stops untrusted data from reaching an LDAP query builder without neutralization of special characters.
Secure engineering principles require safe query construction and escaping that structurally prevents LDAP injection.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization and query parameterization to prevent LDAP injection.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development catches LDAP injection via dynamic analysis or fuzzing, but does not prevent it at the source.
Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and query construction practices that directly prevent LDAP injection.
Application security requirements include explicit rules for safe construction of directory queries, mitigating LDAP injection.
Secure coding standards require proper neutralization of LDAP special characters, directly eliminating this weakness.
Secure architecture principles encourage safe query interfaces but do not prescribe the specific coding controls needed for LDAP injection.
Information access restriction limits who can query LDAP but does not address how queries are built.