CVE-2024-5594
Openvpn 2.6.0 – 2.6.11
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:NSummary
CVE-2024-5594 is a critical-severity Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input (CWE-1287) vulnerability in Openvpn Openvpn. Its CVSS base score is 9.1 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 46% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2024-5594 is a vulnerability in OpenVPN versions prior to 2.6.11 that stems from improper sanitization of PUSH_REPLY messages. An attacker controlling the OpenVPN server can exploit this flaw to inject unexpected arbitrary data, which ends up in the client logs. The issue is classified under CWE-1287 (Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input) and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N), indicating critical severity due to high impacts on confidentiality and integrity.
The attack requires an adversary to control the OpenVPN server, with no privileges, user interaction, or special conditions needed beyond network access. Exploitation allows the injection of arbitrary data into client-side logs, potentially enabling log poisoning, exposure of sensitive information through crafted payloads, or disruption of log integrity for forensic analysis.
Advisories recommend upgrading to OpenVPN 2.6.11 or later to mitigate the vulnerability, as detailed in the official OpenVPN wiki at https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/CVE-2024-5594. Additional guidance appears in the OpenVPN users mailing list at https://www.mail-archive.com/openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg07634.html and Debian LTS announcement at https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00005.html, which cover patched packages for affected distributions.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-47154
Vulnerability Data
OpenVPN before 2.6.11 does not santize PUSH_REPLY messages properly which an attacker controlling the server can use to inject unexpected arbitrary data ending up in client logs.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.1.1V1.4.2V2.1.1V2.2.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs, which structurally prevents type-validation failures from being introduced or exploitable.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require proper input type validation during development.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect type-validation flaws but does not prevent them during development.
Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and type checking to prevent improper type handling.
Application security requirements explicitly include validation of input data types and formats.
Secure architecture principles promote defensive input handling and type enforcement at system boundaries.
Secure coding standards directly require proper type validation of all external inputs.