Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-6502

Gitlab 8.2.0 – 17.1.6

Published
22 August 2024
Modified
11 September 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 5.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0037 30th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-6502 is a medium-severity Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality (CWE-684) vulnerability in Gitlab Gitlab. Its CVSS base score is 5.7 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 8.2 prior to 17.1.6 starting from 17.2 prior to 17.2.4, and starting from 17.3 prior to 17.3.1, which allows an attacker to create a branch with the same…

more

name as a deleted tag.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-5005Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2024-8974Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2026-10733Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-6688Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-0483Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2024-9633Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-1621Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-1178Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-4011Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-0194Same product: Gitlab Gitlab

Affected Assets

gitlab
gitlab
8.2.0 — 17.1.6 · 17.2.0 — 17.2.4 · 17.3.0 — 17.3.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation activities are performed precisely to discover when delivered functionality fails to match published specifications.

Requiring a documented development process and supporting tools reduces the chance that specified functionality will be implemented incorrectly.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce spec-compliant functionality and testing, while eliminating this weakness fulfills only part of the control's broader monitoring intent.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance validates that implemented functionality conforms to specifications before release.

prevents

Secure development life cycle includes requirements and verification activities that directly reduce the risk of delivering functionality that deviates from published specifications.

prevents

Explicit application security requirements and acceptance criteria help ensure the delivered software matches its intended specifications.

prevents

Change management processes reduce the chance of unintended functional deviations during updates, though they do not directly address initial specification conformance.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

RHEL 9 (1 rule)
  • V-258078 RHEL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-684

References