CVE-2024-6595
Gitlab 11.8.0 – 16.11.6
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:NSummary
CVE-2024-6595 is a low-severity User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information (CWE-451) vulnerability in Gitlab Gitlab. Its CVSS base score is 3.0 (Low).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 38th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-3 (Malicious Code Protection) and CM-7 (Least Functionality) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-47660
Vulnerability Data
An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 11.8 prior to 16.11.6, starting from 17.0 prior to 17.0.4, and starting from 17.1 prior to 17.1.2 where it was possible to upload an NPM package with conflicting…
more
package data.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.1.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Malicious-code protection at entry points blocks dangerous file types from being accepted and executed.
Least functionality restricts the file types and automatic processing capabilities the system will accept.
Mobile-code controls define, authorize, and block unacceptable uploaded code before automatic processing occurs.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Restricting execution of unauthorized software directly blocks dangerous uploaded files from running.
Secure SDLC practices directly address design and implementation of accurate, non-spoofable UI elements.
User awareness training helps people recognize and avoid harm from UI misrepresentation such as phishing, but does not prevent the flaw itself.
Hardened configuration baselines can enforce allowed file types and processing rules.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect UI misrepresentation vulnerabilities before deployment.
Security awareness training can teach users to recognize UI misrepresentation and phishing attempts.
Web filtering can block known phishing sites that exploit UI misrepresentation.
Secure development lifecycle includes UI/UX security requirements that can prevent misrepresentation of critical information.
Application security requirements can mandate proper display and validation of critical information in the UI.
Secure coding practices can prevent UI flaws that obscure or spoof critical information.